Easy2Siksha.com
GNDU Question Paper 2023
B.B.A 2
nd
Semester
Paper-BBA-203: Business Laws
Time Allowed: 3 Hours Maximum Marks: 50
Note: Attempt Five questions in all, selecting at least One question from each section. The
Fifth question may be attempted from any section. All questions carry equal marks.
SECTION-A
1. "A Contract is defined as an agreement enforceable at law". Discuss.
2. "Performance of condition of proposal is an acceptance of the proposal". Comment.
SECTION-B
3. When does the problem of appropriation of payment arise ? What are the rules
regarding appropriation?
4. If goods are destroyed, what would be the legal position of buyer and seller in the
following cases:
(a) If they are destroyed before the contract of sale is made.
(b) If they are destroyed after the contract of sale is made.
SECTION-C
5. Explain the remedies of seller and buyer for breach of contract of sale.
Easy2Siksha.com
6. (a) What are unfair trade practices ? Discuss.
(b) Explain consumer with suitable examples.
SECTION-D
7. What is the 'Contract of Guarantee'? What are its kinds?
How can a continuing Guarantee be revoked?
8. Define 'Agent' and 'Principal'. Discuss the rights of and duties of agent.
GNDU Answer Paper 2023
B.B.A 2
nd
Semester
Paper-BBA-203: Business Laws
Time Allowed: 3 Hours Maximum Marks: 50
Note: Attempt Five questions in all, selecting at least One question from each section. The
Fifth question may be attempted from any section. All questions carry equal marks.
SECTION-A
1. "A Contract is defined as an agreement enforceable at law". Discuss.
Ans: “A Contract is defined as an agreement enforceable at law.” Discuss
In everyday life, people make many promises and agreements. For example, you may
promise a friend that you will meet them tomorrow, or you may agree with a shopkeeper to
buy a product. However, not every agreement is considered a contract in the eyes of the
law. The law only recognizes certain agreements as contracts when they fulfill specific
conditions. This idea is clearly expressed in the famous definition: “A contract is an
agreement enforceable at law.”
Easy2Siksha.com
This definition comes from Section 2(h) of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, which states that
“an agreement enforceable by law is a contract.” To understand this definition properly,
we need to examine the meaning of the words agreement, enforceable, and law.
Meaning of Agreement
An agreement is the foundation of every contract. According to the Indian Contract Act, an
agreement is formed when one person makes an offer and the other person accepts it.
For example, suppose Ravi offers to sell his bicycle to Aman for ₹2000. Aman agrees to buy
it for that price. In this situation:
Ravi makes an offer.
Aman gives acceptance.
Once the offer is accepted, an agreement is formed between Ravi and Aman.
However, it is important to understand that all contracts are agreements, but not all
agreements are contracts. Some agreements are simple promises that the law does not
enforce.
For instance, if you promise to take your friend to a movie but later change your mind, your
friend cannot take legal action against you. This type of agreement is based on social
relationships and is not legally binding.
Meaning of Enforceable by Law
The phrase “enforceable by law” is the key factor that turns an agreement into a contract.
When an agreement is enforceable by law, it means that if one party fails to perform their
promise, the other party has the right to go to court and seek legal remedy.
For example, suppose a shopkeeper agrees to sell a laptop to a customer for ₹40,000 and
the customer pays the amount. If the shopkeeper refuses to deliver the laptop after
receiving the money, the customer can approach the court to enforce the agreement. In
such a situation, the law supports the customer because the agreement has legal validity.
Therefore, a contract is not just a promiseit is a legally binding promise.
Essential Elements That Make an Agreement a Contract
For an agreement to become a contract, certain legal requirements must be satisfied. These
are called the essential elements of a valid contract.
Easy2Siksha.com
1. Offer and Acceptance
There must be a clear offer by one party and acceptance by the other party. Both parties
must agree on the same terms.
For example, if a person offers to sell a car for ₹3 lakh and the other person accepts the
offer, the agreement becomes valid.
2. Intention to Create Legal Relations
The parties involved must intend that their agreement should have legal consequences.
For example:
Agreements made in business or commercial transactions usually create legal
relations.
Agreements made in social or family matters usually do not create legal obligations.
If two friends decide to go on a trip together and one cancels later, it is not considered a
contract because there was no intention to create legal relations.
3. Lawful Consideration
Consideration means something of value exchanged between the parties. It can be money,
goods, services, or a promise.
For example, when a person buys a book from a shop, the buyer gives money and the seller
gives the book. Here, money and the book are the consideration.
An agreement without consideration is usually not enforceable.
4. Competent Parties
The parties entering into a contract must be legally capable of doing so. According to law, a
person must:
Be 18 years or older
Be of sound mind
Not be disqualified by law
For example, a minor cannot enter into a valid contract.
Easy2Siksha.com
5. Free Consent
Both parties must agree to the contract freely and willingly. Consent should not be
obtained through:
Force
Fraud
Misrepresentation
Undue influence
If consent is not free, the contract may become invalid.
6. Lawful Object
The purpose of the agreement must be legal. Agreements involving illegal activities cannot
become contracts.
For example, if two people agree to sell illegal drugs, the law will not recognize such an
agreement.
Why This Definition Is Important
The definition “A contract is an agreement enforceable at law” clearly distinguishes
between ordinary agreements and legally binding agreements.
Many agreements exist in daily life, but only those that satisfy legal conditions become
contracts. This definition helps maintain fairness and security in business and social
dealings. It ensures that people keep their promises in commercial transactions and that
victims can seek justice if a promise is broken.
Contracts are extremely important in modern society. They form the basis of business
transactions, employment relationships, property deals, and many other legal activities.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the statement “A contract is an agreement enforceable at law” explains the
true nature of a contract. An agreement alone does not create legal obligations. Only those
agreements that meet certain legal conditions and are recognized by law become contracts.
Thus, every contract begins as an agreement, but it becomes a contract only when the law
allows it to be enforced. This principle ensures trust, fairness, and accountability in personal
and commercial relationships.
Easy2Siksha.com
Therefore, the definition given in the Indian Contract Act perfectly captures the essence of a
contract and highlights the importance of legal enforceability in agreements.
2. "Performance of condition of proposal is an acceptance of the proposal". Comment.
Ans: 󷊆󷊇 Introduction
In contract law, one of the most important principles is that a proposal (or offer) becomes a
contract only when it is accepted. Acceptance can be communicated in words, writing, or
even by conduct. The statement “Performance of condition of proposal is an acceptance of
the proposal” highlights a very practical aspect of contract law: sometimes, simply
performing the condition laid down in the proposal amounts to acceptance, even if no
words are spoken.
This principle is recognized under the Indian Contract Act, 1872 and similar legal systems
worldwide. Let’s break it down in a simple, engaging way so that students can clearly
understand how this works.
󷋇󷋈󷋉󷋊󷋋󷋌 Understanding Proposal and Acceptance
Proposal (Offer): When one person expresses willingness to do or not do something,
with the intention of getting the other person’s consent, it is called a proposal.
Acceptance: When the other person agrees to the proposal, it becomes a promise.
Acceptance can be expressed verbally, in writing, or through conduct.
Now, the law says that if the proposal itself specifies a condition, then performing that
condition is enough to show acceptance. No further communication is required.
󷈷󷈸󷈹󷈺󷈻󷈼 Example to Illustrate
Imagine a bus company puts up a notice:
“By boarding this bus, you agree to pay ₹20 as fare.”
Here, the proposal is clear: the company offers transport in exchange for payment.
If you board the bus, you have performed the condition of the proposal.
That act itself is acceptance—you don’t need to say “I accept.”
So, the contract is formed when you step into the bus.
󷋇󷋈󷋉󷋊󷋋󷋌 Legal Basis
Section 8 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 states:
Easy2Siksha.com
“Performance of the conditions of a proposal, or the acceptance of any consideration for a
reciprocal promise, is an acceptance of the proposal.”
This means:
If the offeror sets a condition, and the offeree performs it, the contract is binding.
Acceptance can be implied through conduct, not just words.
󷈷󷈸󷈹󷈺󷈻󷈼 More Examples
1. Reward Cases
o A person offers a reward: “₹500 to anyone who finds my lost dog.”
o If you find the dog and return it, you have accepted the proposal by
performance.
o You don’t need to write a letter saying “I accept your offer.”
2. Carbolic Smoke Ball Case (Famous English Case)
o A company advertised that anyone using their medicine as directed would
not catch influenza, and promised compensation if they did.
o A woman used the medicine and still caught influenza.
o The court held that by using the medicine (performing the condition), she
had accepted the proposal, and the company was bound to pay.
3. Daily Life Example
o A parking lot displays: “By parking here, you agree to pay ₹50.”
o Parking your car is acceptance by performance.
󷋇󷋈󷋉󷋊󷋋󷋌 Importance of This Principle
1. Simplifies Contracts
o Not every agreement needs formal acceptance.
o Everyday transactions (bus rides, parking, rewards) work smoothly because
performance itself counts as acceptance.
2. Protects Both Parties
o The proposer cannot deny the contract once the condition is performed.
o The performer is entitled to the promised consideration.
3. Encourages Trust in Transactions
o People can rely on offers made publicly (like rewards or services).
o Performing the condition ensures they get the benefit.
󷈷󷈸󷈹󷈺󷈻󷈼 Limitations and Conditions
Clear Proposal: The condition must be clearly stated.
Knowledge of Proposal: The person performing must know about the proposal.
o Example: If you return a lost dog without knowing about the reward, you
cannot claim it.
Voluntary Performance: The act must be voluntary, not forced.
Legal Object: The proposal must be lawful. Performing an illegal condition cannot
create a valid contract.
Easy2Siksha.com
󷋇󷋈󷋉󷋊󷋋󷋌 Application in Punjab’s Social and Commercial Life
In regions like Punjab, where trade, agriculture, and services are vibrant, this principle plays
out daily:
Farmers selling produce in mandis (markets) accept buyers’ offers by delivering
goods.
Transport services (rickshaws, buses) operate on implied contracts where boarding is
acceptance.
Reward notices for lost items are common, and returning them is acceptance by
performance.
This shows how law is not abstractit governs everyday life in practical ways.
󽆪󽆫󽆬 Conclusion
The statement “Performance of condition of proposal is an acceptance of the proposal”
means that when someone performs the act specified in an offer, that act itself counts as
acceptance, even without words. This principle, rooted in Section 8 of the Indian Contract
Act, ensures that contracts can be formed smoothly in daily life.
SECTION-B
3. When does the problem of appropriation of payment arise ? What are the rules
regarding appropriation?
Ans: Appropriation of Payment: Meaning, When the Problem Arises, and the Rules
In everyday life, people often borrow money or take goods on credit and repay the amount
later. Sometimes a person may owe several different debts to the same creditor. When that
person makes a payment, a question may arise: Which debt should that payment be
applied to? This situation leads to the concept known as appropriation of payment.
Appropriation of payment is an important concept in the law of contracts. It explains how a
payment made by a debtor should be applied when the debtor owes multiple debts to the
same creditor. The rules governing appropriation help avoid confusion and disputes
between the debtor and the creditor.
Meaning of Appropriation of Payment
The term appropriation of payment refers to the application of a payment made by a
debtor to a particular debt when several debts exist between the same debtor and
creditor.
Easy2Siksha.com
For example, imagine that a person named Rahul owes his friend Amit three different debts:
₹5,000 borrowed in January
₹3,000 borrowed in March
₹2,000 borrowed in May
Now suppose Rahul pays Amit ₹3,000 without clearly stating which debt he wants to repay.
The question arises: Which debt should Amit treat as paid?
The process of deciding which debt the payment will settle is called appropriation of
payment.
In India, the rules regarding appropriation of payment are mainly provided under Sections
59, 60, and 61 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872.
When Does the Problem of Appropriation of Payment Arise?
The problem of appropriation of payment arises only in certain situations. It does not arise
in every case of payment.
The problem occurs when the following conditions exist:
1. There Are Several Debts
The debtor must owe more than one debt to the same creditor.
If there is only one debt, then there is no confusion about how the payment should be
applied.
For example:
If Ravi owes only ₹10,000 to a bank and he pays ₹4,000, the payment will obviously go
toward that single debt. In this case, no appropriation problem arises.
But if Ravi owes the bank three different loans, then the question arises about which loan
the payment should reduce.
2. The Debts Are Between the Same Parties
The debts must exist between the same debtor and the same creditor.
For example:
If Meena owes ₹5,000 to Rohan and ₹3,000 to Sohan, and she pays ₹3,000 to Rohan, the
issue of appropriation does not arise because the debts are owed to different people.
Easy2Siksha.com
3. The Payment Is Not Sufficient to Pay All Debts
Appropriation becomes necessary when the payment made is not enough to clear all the
debts.
For example:
If a debtor owes ₹10,000 in total and pays the full ₹10,000, then all debts are cleared and no
problem arises.
But if the debtor pays only ₹3,000, then the question becomes:
Which of the debts should be reduced?
4. The Debts Are Distinct and Separate
The debts must be separate and identifiable.
For instance, separate loans, bills, or credit purchases may create different debts.
Rules Regarding Appropriation of Payment
The Indian Contract Act, 1872 lays down three important rules regarding appropriation of
payment. These rules determine who has the right to decide how the payment should be
applied.
The three rules are:
1. Appropriation by the Debtor
2. Appropriation by the Creditor
3. Appropriation by Law
Let us understand each rule clearly.
1. Appropriation by the Debtor (Section 59)
The first right belongs to the debtor.
If the debtor clearly states which debt the payment should apply to, the creditor must
follow the debtor’s instruction.
Example
Easy2Siksha.com
Suppose Arjun owes Ramesh three debts:
₹5,000 for a personal loan
₹4,000 for goods purchased
₹3,000 borrowed earlier
Arjun pays ₹4,000 and says:
“Please adjust this payment against the amount I owe for goods.”
In this case, Ramesh must apply the payment to the goods debt, because the debtor has
clearly specified it.
The creditor cannot ignore the debtor’s instructions.
This rule protects the debtor because it allows them to decide which obligation they want
to settle first.
2. Appropriation by the Creditor (Section 60)
Sometimes the debtor does not give any instructions about how the payment should be
applied.
In such cases, the creditor gets the right to decide.
The creditor may apply the payment to any lawful debt owed by the debtor.
Example
Suppose Karan owes Mohan three debts:
₹2,000 borrowed in January
₹4,000 borrowed in March
₹3,000 borrowed in June
Karan pays ₹2,000 but does not say which debt it should be applied to.
Now Mohan has the right to decide.
He may apply the payment to:
The January loan, or
The March loan, or
The June loan
Easy2Siksha.com
The creditor can even apply it to a time-barred debt (a debt that cannot be legally enforced
due to limitation).
However, the creditor must make the appropriation clearly and honestly.
3. Appropriation by Law (Section 61)
Sometimes neither the debtor nor the creditor makes any appropriation.
In such situations, the law itself decides how the payment should be applied.
According to the law:
Payments are applied in the order of time, meaning the oldest debt is paid first.
This rule is often called the “First in, First out” principle.
Example
Suppose a debtor owes the following debts:
₹2,000 taken in January
₹3,000 taken in March
₹4,000 taken in June
The debtor pays ₹2,000 without giving instructions, and the creditor also does not make any
decision.
In this case, the law will apply the payment to the January debt, because it is the oldest.
If several debts were incurred on the same date, then the payment is divided
proportionately among them.
Importance of Appropriation of Payment
The rules of appropriation are very important in financial and legal relationships. They help
maintain fairness and clarity between debtors and creditors.
Some key reasons why these rules are important include:
They prevent disputes between the parties.
They provide clear legal guidance when multiple debts exist.
They ensure that payments are applied in an organized and lawful manner.
They protect the interests of both the debtor and the creditor.
Easy2Siksha.com
Without these rules, disagreements about payments could easily arise.
Conclusion
The problem of appropriation of payment arises when a debtor owes multiple debts to the
same creditor and makes a payment that is not enough to cover all the debts. In such
situations, it becomes necessary to determine which particular debt the payment should
settle.
The Indian Contract Act provides a clear system to solve this issue. First, the debtor has the
right to specify the debt to which the payment should apply. If the debtor does not specify,
the creditor has the right to decide. Finally, if neither party makes a decision, the law
applies the payment to the oldest debt first.
These rules ensure fairness, clarity, and order in financial transactions. By understanding the
concept of appropriation of payment, students can better appreciate how contract law
manages situations involving multiple debts and partial payments.
4. If goods are destroyed, what would be the legal position of buyer and seller in the
following cases:
(a) If they are destroyed before the contract of sale is made.
(b) If they are destroyed after the contract of sale is made.
Ans: 󷊆󷊇 Introduction
In the law of contracts and sales, one of the most important questions is: What happens if
goods are destroyed? The answer depends on when the goods are destroyedbefore the
contract of sale is made, or after the contract has already been concluded. The legal position
of both buyer and seller changes drastically depending on this timing.
This principle is governed by the Sale of Goods Act, 1930 in India (and similar laws
elsewhere), which clearly defines the rights and liabilities of buyers and sellers in such
situations. Let’s explore both cases in detail, with examples, so that the concept becomes
easy to understand.
󷋇󷋈󷋉󷋊󷋋󷋌 Case (a): Goods Destroyed Before the Contract of Sale is Made
Legal Position
If goods are destroyed before the contract is made, and neither the buyer nor the
seller knows about it, then the contract is void ab initio (void from the beginning).
Easy2Siksha.com
This is because the subject matter of the contract does not exist. Without goods,
there can be no valid sale.
Why Void?
A contract requires an existing subject matter.
If the goods are already destroyed, the seller cannot transfer ownership, and the
buyer cannot receive them.
Therefore, the contract is impossible to perform.
Example
Suppose a farmer in Punjab agrees to sell 100 sacks of wheat stored in his warehouse to a
trader. Unknown to both, the warehouse caught fire the previous night and the wheat was
destroyed.
Since the goods no longer exist, the contract is void.
Neither the farmer nor the trader is liable, because both were unaware of the
destruction.
Buyer’s Position
The buyer cannot demand delivery, because the goods do not exist.
The buyer also cannot sue for damages, since the seller was not at fault.
Seller’s Position
The seller is not liable, because he cannot sell what does not exist.
If the seller knowingly concealed the destruction, then he may be liable for fraud.
󷋇󷋈󷋉󷋊󷋋󷋌 Case (b): Goods Destroyed After the Contract of Sale is Made
Legal Position
Here, the situation is different. Once the contract is made, the rights and liabilities depend
on whether the ownership (property in goods) has passed to the buyer or not.
1. If Ownership Has Passed to the Buyer
The buyer bears the risk.
Even if the goods are destroyed after the contract, the buyer must pay the price.
The principle is: Risk follows ownership.
Example: A trader buys 50 bags of rice from a merchant. The contract is complete, and
ownership has passed to the trader. Before delivery, the rice is destroyed in a flood.
The trader must still pay the price, because ownership had already passed.
The seller is not liable.
Easy2Siksha.com
2. If Ownership Has Not Yet Passed to the Buyer
The seller bears the risk.
If the goods are destroyed before ownership passes, the seller cannot demand
payment.
The contract becomes void due to impossibility.
Example: A trader agrees to buy 20 cows from a farmer, but the cows are to be delivered
after one week. Before delivery, the cows die due to disease.
Since ownership had not yet passed, the seller bears the loss.
The buyer is not liable to pay.
󷈷󷈸󷈹󷈺󷈻󷈼 Key Principles
1. Risk Follows Ownership
o Whoever owns the goods at the time of destruction bears the loss.
o If ownership has passed to the buyer, the buyer bears the risk.
o If ownership is still with the seller, the seller bears the risk.
2. Knowledge of Destruction
o If goods are destroyed before the contract and both parties are unaware, the
contract is void.
o If one party knew, it may amount to fraud.
3. Specific Goods vs. Unascertained Goods
o These rules apply mainly to specific goods (identified at the time of contract).
o For unascertained goods (not yet identified), ownership does not pass until
they are specified, so the seller usually bears the risk until then.
󷋇󷋈󷋉󷋊󷋋󷋌 Everyday Illustrations in Punjab’s Context
Agriculture: A farmer promises to sell a specific harvest of wheat. If the crop is
destroyed before the contract, the agreement is void. If destroyed after the contract
but before ownership passes, the farmer bears the loss.
Trade: A textile merchant agrees to sell specific rolls of cloth. If the rolls are burnt
after ownership passes, the buyer must pay.
Livestock: A dairy farmer sells specific cows. If they die before ownership passes, the
farmer bears the loss.
󷈷󷈸󷈹󷈺󷈻󷈼 Comparative Table
Situation
Ownership
Passed?
Who Bears the
Loss?
Legal Position
Goods destroyed before
contract
Not applicable
No one
Contract void
Goods destroyed after
contract
Yes
Buyer
Buyer must
pay
Easy2Siksha.com
Goods destroyed after
contract
No
Seller
Seller bears
loss
󽆪󽆫󽆬 Conclusion
The legal position of buyer and seller when goods are destroyed depends entirely on timing
and ownership.
If goods are destroyed before the contract, the contract is void because the subject
matter does not exist.
If goods are destroyed after the contract, the question is whether ownership has
passed. If yes, the buyer bears the risk; if not, the seller bears the risk.
SECTION-C
5. Explain the remedies of seller and buyer for breach of contract of sale.
Ans: A contract of sale is an agreement between a seller and a buyer where the seller
promises to transfer ownership of goods to the buyer for a price. This concept is governed
mainly by the Sale of Goods Act, 1930 in India. In an ideal situation, both parties fulfill their
promises: the seller delivers the goods and the buyer pays the price. However, sometimes
one party fails to perform their part of the agreement. This failure is known as a breach of
contract.
When a breach of contract occurs, the law provides certain remedies to protect the rights of
the innocent party. These remedies help the affected party recover losses or enforce the
contract. Both the seller and the buyer have specific legal remedies available when the
other party breaks the contract.
Let us understand these remedies in a clear and simple manner.
Remedies Available to the Seller
When the buyer fails to perform his obligationssuch as refusing to pay for the goods or
refusing to accept deliverythe seller can use certain remedies provided by law. These
remedies are mainly divided into remedies against the goods and remedies against the
buyer personally.
1. Suit for Price
Easy2Siksha.com
If the buyer refuses to pay for the goods after ownership has passed to him, the seller has
the right to file a suit for price. This means the seller can approach the court and demand
that the buyer pay the agreed price.
For example, suppose a seller sells 100 bags of rice to a buyer and ownership has already
transferred. If the buyer refuses to pay after receiving the goods, the seller can file a case in
court to recover the payment.
This remedy ensures that the seller does not suffer financial loss due to the buyer’s refusal
to pay.
2. Suit for Damages for Non-Acceptance
Sometimes the buyer refuses to accept the goods even though the seller is ready to deliver
them according to the contract. In such cases, the seller can file a suit for damages for non-
acceptance.
Damages refer to compensation for the loss suffered by the seller because of the buyer’s
refusal.
For example, if the seller manufactured special furniture for a buyer and the buyer suddenly
refuses to accept it, the seller may suffer losses. The law allows the seller to claim
compensation for such losses.
3. Lien on Goods
A lien means the right of the seller to retain possession of the goods until payment is made.
If the buyer has not yet paid for the goods and the seller still possesses them, the seller can
refuse to deliver the goods until the buyer pays the price.
For instance, if a shopkeeper sells a machine but the buyer delays payment, the shopkeeper
can keep the machine with him until the payment is completed.
This remedy protects the seller from giving away goods without receiving payment.
4. Stoppage of Goods in Transit
If the seller has already dispatched the goods but later discovers that the buyer has become
insolvent (unable to pay debts), the seller can stop the goods while they are still in transit.
This right is known as stoppage in transit.
Easy2Siksha.com
For example, suppose goods are being transported by truck or ship to the buyer. If the seller
learns that the buyer has gone bankrupt, the seller can instruct the carrier to stop the
delivery and return the goods.
This prevents the seller from losing both the goods and the money.
5. Right of Resale
In some situations, the seller may resell the goods if the buyer fails to pay or refuses to
accept them.
The seller usually gives notice to the buyer before reselling. If the resale price is lower than
the original contract price, the seller can recover the difference from the buyer as damages.
For example, if goods were sold for ₹50,000 but the buyer refuses to pay and the seller later
sells them for ₹40,000, the seller can claim ₹10,000 as compensation.
Remedies Available to the Buyer
Just like the seller, the buyer also has certain remedies when the seller breaks the contract.
These remedies protect the buyer when the seller fails to deliver goods or provides goods
that do not meet the agreed conditions.
1. Suit for Damages for Non-Delivery
If the seller refuses or fails to deliver the goods according to the contract, the buyer can file
a suit for damages for non-delivery.
This means the buyer can claim compensation for the loss suffered because the seller did
not deliver the goods.
For example, if a buyer agreed to purchase goods for ₹10,000 but due to the seller’s refusal
the buyer had to purchase the same goods from another seller for ₹12,000, the buyer can
claim ₹2,000 as damages.
2. Suit for Specific Performance
In some cases, money compensation may not be enough. If the goods are unique or special,
the buyer may request the court to order the seller to deliver the goods exactly as
promised.
This remedy is called specific performance.
Easy2Siksha.com
For instance, if a buyer purchases a rare painting, antique item, or unique property and the
seller refuses to deliver it, the court may order the seller to fulfill the contract rather than
just paying damages.
3. Suit for Breach of Warranty
A warranty is a promise about the quality or condition of goods. If the seller breaches this
warranty, the buyer cannot reject the goods but can claim damages.
For example, if a seller promises that a machine will work for two years but it stops working
after six months, the buyer can claim compensation for the loss.
This remedy helps the buyer recover the cost of defects or problems in the goods.
4. Suit for Repudiation of Contract
Sometimes the seller cancels the contract before the delivery date. This is known as
repudiation of contract.
In such cases, the buyer has two options:
Accept the cancellation and claim damages immediately, or
Wait until the delivery date and then file a suit if the seller still fails to perform.
This remedy ensures that the buyer’s interests remain protected even when the seller
refuses to honor the contract early.
Conclusion
A contract of sale creates legal obligations for both the seller and the buyer. When either
party fails to perform their duties, it leads to a breach of contract. To ensure fairness and
protect the rights of both parties, the law provides several remedies.
The seller’s remedies mainly focus on recovering the price, claiming damages, or protecting
possession of goods through rights like lien, stoppage in transit, and resale.
On the other hand, the buyer’s remedies help ensure that the buyer receives the goods
promised in the contract or receives compensation if the seller fails to deliver them.
These legal remedies play an important role in maintaining trust and fairness in commercial
transactions. They ensure that neither the buyer nor the seller suffers unjust losses when a
Easy2Siksha.com
contract is broken. In this way, the provisions of the Sale of Goods Act help create a
balanced and reliable system for buying and selling goods.
6. (a) What are unfair trade practices ? Discuss.
(b) Explain consumer with suitable examples.
Ans: 󷊆󷊇 Introduction
In the modern marketplace, consumers often face challenges due to deceptive or unethical
practices by sellers and businesses. To protect buyers, laws such as the Consumer
Protection Act in India define and prohibit unfair trade practices. At the same time, the law
clarifies who a consumer is, because only consumers enjoy protection under these laws.
Let’s break this complex question into two parts: first, understanding unfair trade practices,
and second, explaining the meaning of a consumer with relatable examples.
󷋇󷋈󷋉󷋊󷋋󷋌 (a) What are Unfair Trade Practices?
Meaning
Unfair trade practices refer to business activities that are deceptive, fraudulent, or
unethical, and which mislead or exploit consumers. These practices violate the principle of
fair dealing and are prohibited by law.
The Consumer Protection Act defines unfair trade practices as those that involve
misrepresentation, false advertising, deceptive pricing, or exploitation of consumers.
Types of Unfair Trade Practices
1. False Representation
o Claiming that goods or services are of a particular quality, grade, or standard
when they are not.
o Example: Selling ordinary jewelry as “pure gold” when it is only gold-plated.
2. False Advertising
o Misleading advertisements that exaggerate the benefits of a product.
o Example: A fairness cream claiming to make someone “fair in 7 days,” which
is scientifically impossible.
3. Deceptive Pricing
o Charging more than the advertised price or hiding extra costs.
o Example: A shop advertises a phone at ₹10,000 but adds hidden charges,
making the buyer pay ₹12,000.
4. Bait and Switch
o Advertising a product at a low price to attract customers, but then pushing
them to buy a more expensive product.
Easy2Siksha.com
o Example: A store advertises a laptop at ₹20,000 but tells customers it is “out
of stock” and persuades them to buy a costlier one.
5. Sale of Substandard Goods
o Selling goods that do not meet safety or quality standards.
o Example: Selling expired medicines or defective electrical appliances.
6. Hoarding and Black Marketing
o Deliberately creating artificial scarcity to raise prices.
o Example: Hoarding onions during shortage and selling them at double the
price.
7. Warranty and Guarantee Misuse
o Refusing to honor warranties or guarantees promised at the time of sale.
o Example: A company promises free repair for one year but refuses service
when the product breaks down.
Impact of Unfair Trade Practices
On Consumers: Loss of money, health risks, disappointment, and exploitation.
On Society: Erodes trust in businesses, creates inequality, and encourages
corruption.
On Economy: Reduces consumer confidence, affecting overall market growth.
Legal Protection
The Consumer Protection Act, 2019 in India empowers consumers to file complaints against
unfair trade practices. Consumer forums at district, state, and national levels provide speedy
redressal.
󷋇󷋈󷋉󷋊󷋋󷋌 (b) Who is a Consumer?
Meaning
A consumer is a person who buys goods or services for personal use and not for resale or
commercial purposes. The law protects consumers because they are the end-users who rely
on businesses for products and services.
Definition under Law
According to the Consumer Protection Act:
A consumer is someone who buys goods for consideration (money or promise of
payment).
A consumer is also someone who hires or avails services for consideration.
The definition includes users of goods or services with the buyer’s approval.
Examples of Consumers
1. Buying Goods
o Ramesh buys a refrigerator for his home. He is a consumer.
Easy2Siksha.com
o If he buys refrigerators to resell in his shop, he is not a consumer under the
Act.
2. Availing Services
o Sita books a train ticket. She is a consumer of railway services.
o A student paying tuition fees is a consumer of educational services.
3. Indirect Users
o A child eating biscuits bought by her parents is also considered a consumer.
o Family members using electricity at home are consumers, even if the bill is
paid by one person.
Who is Not a Consumer?
A person buying goods for resale or commercial use.
Example: A wholesaler buying 100 sacks of wheat to sell in the market is not a
consumer.
However, if goods are bought for self-employment (like a tailor buying a sewing
machine to earn livelihood), he is treated as a consumer.
󷈷󷈸󷈹󷈺󷈻󷈼 Importance of Defining Consumer
Ensures that only genuine end-users get protection.
Prevents misuse of consumer laws by traders or businesses.
Helps courts and forums decide cases fairly.
󷋇󷋈󷋉󷋊󷋋󷋌 Everyday Illustrations in Punjab’s Context
A farmer buying fertilizer for his own fields is a consumer.
A shopkeeper buying fertilizer to resell is not a consumer.
A student in Amritsar paying for coaching classes is a consumer of educational
services.
A passenger using Punjab Roadways buses is a consumer of transport services.
󽆪󽆫󽆬 Conclusion
Unfair trade practices are deceptive, fraudulent, or unethical activities by businesses that
exploit consumerssuch as false advertising, deceptive pricing, or selling substandard
goods. To protect against these, consumer laws provide remedies and empower individuals
to fight exploitation.
A consumer is the end-user who buys goods or avails services for personal use. Examples
include buying household items, using transport, or paying for education. Traders buying
goods for resale are not consumers, but individuals buying tools for self-employment are
protected.
Easy2Siksha.com
SECTION-D
7. What is the 'Contract of Guarantee'? What are its kinds?
How can a continuing Guarantee be revoked?
Ans: Contract of Guarantee: Meaning, Kinds, and Revocation of Continuing Guarantee
In everyday life, people often depend on trust. Sometimes a person may want to borrow
money, buy goods on credit, or take a loan from a bank, but the lender may not fully trust
the borrower. In such situations, a third person may step in and promise the lender that if
the borrower fails to pay the debt, he will pay it instead. This promise creates what the law
calls a Contract of Guarantee.
The concept of a Contract of Guarantee is defined in Section 126 of the Indian Contract Act,
1872. It is a common arrangement in financial dealings, business transactions, and banking
operations.
Meaning of Contract of Guarantee
A Contract of Guarantee is an agreement in which one person promises to perform the
obligation or discharge the liability of another person if that person fails to do so.
In simple words, it is a promise to pay someone else’s debt if they cannot pay it
themselves.
For example, suppose Rahul wants to take a loan from a bank, but the bank is not sure
whether Rahul will repay the loan. Rahul’s friend Aman promises the bank that if Rahul
fails to repay the loan, he will pay the amount. This promise made by Aman is called a
Contract of Guarantee.
Parties in a Contract of Guarantee
A Contract of Guarantee always involves three parties:
1. Creditor
The creditor is the person who gives the loan or credit.
Example: In the previous example, the bank is the creditor because it lends money to Rahul.
2. Principal Debtor
Easy2Siksha.com
The principal debtor is the person who takes the loan or incurs the liability.
Example: Rahul is the principal debtor because he borrowed the money.
3. Surety
The surety is the person who gives the guarantee and promises to pay the debt if the
principal debtor fails.
Example: Aman is the surety because he promised to pay if Rahul does not repay the loan.
So, the relationship works like this:
The principal debtor owes money to the creditor.
The surety guarantees the creditor that the debt will be paid.
If the principal debtor fails to pay, the surety becomes responsible.
Essential Features of a Contract of Guarantee
A Contract of Guarantee has some important characteristics:
1. Three parties are involved creditor, principal debtor, and surety.
2. There must be a promise by the surety to perform the liability of the debtor if the
debtor fails.
3. The liability of the surety is secondary, meaning the surety becomes liable only
when the principal debtor fails to pay.
4. Consideration is necessary, but the benefit given to the principal debtor is enough to
support the guarantee.
5. The guarantee may be oral or written under Indian law.
Kinds of Contract of Guarantee
The Contract of Guarantee is mainly divided into two types:
1. Specific Guarantee
2. Continuing Guarantee
Let us understand each of them clearly.
1. Specific Guarantee
Easy2Siksha.com
A Specific Guarantee is a guarantee that is given for a single transaction or a particular
debt. Once that particular transaction is completed and the debt is paid, the guarantee ends
automatically.
In other words, the surety’s responsibility exists only for one specific deal.
Example
Suppose Rohit wants to purchase goods worth ₹50,000 from a supplier on credit. The
supplier asks for security before giving the goods. Rohit’s friend Suresh guarantees that
Rohit will pay the amount.
If Rohit pays the ₹50,000, the guarantee ends. If he fails, Suresh must pay.
After this transaction is completed, Suresh has no further liability. Therefore, this is a
Specific Guarantee.
2. Continuing Guarantee
A Continuing Guarantee is a guarantee that extends to a series of transactions rather than
just one.
In this type of guarantee, the surety agrees to be responsible for multiple transactions over
a period of time.
This guarantee remains valid until it is revoked or cancelled.
Example
Suppose a shopkeeper regularly buys goods from a wholesaler on credit. A friend of the
shopkeeper guarantees the wholesaler that he will pay if the shopkeeper fails to pay for
any goods purchased in the future.
Since the guarantee applies to many transactions over time, it is called a Continuing
Guarantee.
Revocation of Continuing Guarantee
Since a continuing guarantee applies to multiple transactions, the surety may want to end
or withdraw the guarantee at some point. The law allows the surety to revoke or cancel the
guarantee in certain ways.
According to the Indian Contract Act, a continuing guarantee can be revoked in the
following ways.
Easy2Siksha.com
1. Revocation by Notice
A continuing guarantee can be revoked by giving notice to the creditor.
When the surety sends notice to the creditor stating that he no longer wants to continue
the guarantee, the guarantee is revoked for future transactions.
However, the surety remains liable for transactions that took place before the notice.
Example
Suppose a surety guarantees payment for goods supplied to a shopkeeper regularly. Later,
the surety sends a notice to the supplier stating that he is withdrawing the guarantee.
The surety will still be responsible for debts already incurred.
But he will not be responsible for future supplies made after the notice.
2. Revocation by Death of the Surety
The death of the surety automatically revokes the continuing guarantee, unless there is a
contract stating otherwise.
This means that after the death of the surety:
The guarantee ends for future transactions.
But the surety’s estate may still be liable for previous transactions.
Example
If a person guarantees credit purchases made by a trader and then dies, the guarantee will
not apply to new purchases made after his death, but it will still apply to debts incurred
earlier.
Important Point about Revocation
It is important to understand that revocation does not cancel past liabilities.
The surety remains responsible for all transactions that occurred before the revocation.
The revocation only stops the guarantee for future dealings.
Conclusion
Easy2Siksha.com
A Contract of Guarantee is an important concept in business and financial transactions. It
helps build trust between parties when a lender is unsure about the borrower’s ability to
repay. In this contract, a third person called the surety promises to fulfill the obligation of
the principal debtor if the debtor fails to do so.
There are two main types of guarantees: Specific Guarantee, which applies to a single
transaction, and Continuing Guarantee, which applies to a series of transactions over time.
Continuing guarantees are commonly used in business relationships where repeated
transactions occur.
However, the law also protects the surety by allowing the revocation of a continuing
guarantee. The surety can revoke it by giving notice to the creditor or it may be revoked
automatically upon the death of the surety. Even after revocation, the surety remains
responsible for liabilities that arose before the guarantee was withdrawn.
8. Define 'Agent' and 'Principal'. Discuss the rights of and duties of agent.
Ans: 󷊆󷊇 Introduction
In the world of business and law, relationships are often built on trust and representation.
One person may act on behalf of another to carry out transactions, sign contracts, or
manage affairs. This relationship is legally recognized as that of an Agent and a Principal.
The law of agency, governed in India by the Indian Contract Act, 1872, defines their roles,
rights, and duties. Understanding this concept is crucial because agency relationships are
everywherefrom shopkeepers selling goods on behalf of owners to lawyers representing
clients in court.
󷋇󷋈󷋉󷋊󷋋󷋌 Definition of Agent and Principal
Agent
An Agent is a person employed to act on behalf of another. He represents the Principal in
dealings with third parties.
Example: A property broker selling a house on behalf of the owner is an agent.
Principal
A Principal is the person who appoints the agent to act on his behalf. The Principal is bound
by the acts of the agent, provided they are within the scope of authority.
Example: The house owner who appoints the broker is the principal.
In simple words: The agent is the “doer,” and the principal is the “owner of the work.” The
agent acts, but the principal bears the responsibility.
Easy2Siksha.com
󷈷󷈸󷈹󷈺󷈻󷈼 Rights of an Agent
Agents are not just duty-bound; they also enjoy certain rights to ensure fairness in their
relationship with the principal.
1. Right to Remuneration
An agent has the right to be paid for services rendered.
Example: A commission agent selling goods in a mandi (market) in Punjab is entitled
to commission.
2. Right of Retainer
An agent can retain money received on behalf of the principal until his dues (like
commission or expenses) are paid.
3. Right of Lien
An agent has a lien (right to hold) on the principal’s property until his remuneration
and expenses are cleared.
Example: A shipping agent may hold goods until freight charges are paid.
4. Right to Indemnity
If the agent suffers loss while acting lawfully on behalf of the principal, he can claim
indemnity (compensation).
Example: If an agent pays customs duty on imported goods, the principal must
reimburse him.
5. Right to Act in Emergency
In emergencies, an agent can act in the best interest of the principal, even beyond
instructions, and claim expenses.
Example: If goods are perishable, the agent may sell them quickly to prevent loss.
󷋇󷋈󷋉󷋊󷋋󷋌 Duties of an Agent
With rights come responsibilities. The agent must act honestly and in the best interest of the
principal.
1. Duty to Follow Instructions
The agent must act according to the principal’s directions.
Example: If instructed to sell goods at ₹500 per unit, the agent cannot sell them at
₹400.
2. Duty of Care and Skill
Easy2Siksha.com
The agent must perform tasks with reasonable care and skill.
Example: A stockbroker must handle investments carefully to avoid unnecessary
losses.
3. Duty to Render Accounts
The agent must provide accurate accounts of transactions to the principal.
Example: A travel agent must give a clear record of ticket sales and expenses.
4. Duty to Act in Good Faith
The agent must act honestly and not make secret profits.
Example: If an agent buys goods at a lower price, he must disclose it to the principal
instead of pocketing the difference.
5. Duty Not to Delegate Authority
The agent cannot delegate his authority unless permitted.
Example: A lawyer cannot pass on a client’s case to another lawyer without consent.
6. Duty to Protect Interests in Emergencies
The agent must act prudently in emergencies to safeguard the principal’s interests.
󷈷󷈸󷈹󷈺󷈻󷈼 Everyday Examples in Punjab’s Context
Agriculture: Commission agents (arhtiyas) sell farmers’ produce in mandis. Farmers
are principals, and agents are intermediaries.
Property: Brokers selling land or houses act as agents for owners.
Business: Shop managers act as agents for business owners.
Legal: Lawyers represent clients in court as agents.
These examples show how agency relationships are woven into daily life.
󷋇󷋈󷋉󷋊󷋋󷋌 Importance of Agency Relationship
Facilitates Trade: Principals can expand business through agents.
Saves Time: Agents handle tasks on behalf of busy principals.
Creates Trust: The law ensures agents act responsibly and principals respect agents’
rights.
Legal Accountability: Principals are bound by agents’ lawful acts, ensuring smooth
transactions.
󽆪󽆫󽆬 Conclusion
An Agent is someone who acts on behalf of a Principal, and the Principal is the person who
authorizes the agent. The relationship is built on trust, responsibility, and legal
Easy2Siksha.com
accountability. Agents enjoy rights such as remuneration, lien, indemnity, and authority in
emergencies. At the same time, they must fulfill duties like following instructions, acting
with care, rendering accounts, and maintaining good faith.
“This paper has been carefully prepared for educational purposes. If you notice any mistakes or
have suggestions, feel free to share your feedback.”